1. The art of teaching science, the science of teaching art
Science is a discipline based upon inquiry, curiosity, rigour, creativity and exploration, underlain by an inherent focus on safety. My science classroom, therefore, centres on mutual respect between students and teachers, safety during all experimental and non-experimental work, a continual process of conscious and unconscious learning and a withstanding sense of enjoyment. These aspects of schooling are not dissimilar from that observed in other disciplines, as most teachers strive to create a fun and educational environment; albeit, the focus on safety is different from that relevant to other key learning areas (KLAs), as the use of chemicals, fire, glassware, scalpels, pathogens etc. necessitates a different approach to supervision, responsibility, trust and awareness in the classroom.
This indicates that a high level of cross-over exists between planning strategies used in different KLAs, as teachers across disciplines aim to establish similar learning environments, but that the application of these strategies varies. A focus on hands-on applications of concepts being investigated is implemented universally, but is of particular significance in the context of a science classroom. Learning-by-doing is often considered to be the most engaging and informative method for scientific learning, as it is an ideal way for students to investigate, prove, disprove, observe, understand and/or create a concept experimentally after learning about the theory underlying it. This highlights the ‘real-ness’ of their studies, and assists in uncovering the connectivity between their life and their schooling. This sought after ‘relevance-factor’ is applicable to all KLAs, but, once again, the reality of this varies between them.
~~~***~~~
2. Bloom’s Chemical Taxonomy
I have observed the effectiveness of the learning-by-doing strategy in classes that I have taught, using experimentation to strengthen, clarify, alter and/or confirm students’ understanding of the theory being studied. Year 11 Chemistry were investigating the theory of the adhesion, cohesion, viscosity and surface tension of water, and undertook experiments which allowed them to directly observe these phenomena in their practical lessons. It was evident that they had a much greater conceptual understanding of these principles after they had undertaken this experimentation, as compared to their initial understanding of these effects and their implications. Predictions can be proven or contradicted, hypotheses confirmed or rebutted: direct observation allows the science student to reconcile their theoretical enquiries with their practical investigations, and relate this to the world at large. Remembering that the textbook describes a solution of hydrochloric acid as acidic and actually observing evidence of this acidity involves two separate levels of learning, and therefore necessitates different learning activities to be achieved. Bloom’s Taxonomy would classify these as Remembering and Understanding, respectively, and it is evident that the Year 11 Chemistry class are currently grappling with these states of cognition. These processes are laying down the foundations required to progress to the level of Application and beyond, at which stage students will be able to draw connections between their theoretical and practical knowledge. Their deductive reasoning will come to the fore as they learn to recognise patterns, formulate predictions, devise methods to confirm or refute these, infer trends, and evaluate the success and relevance of their results.
By contrast, the Year 12 Chemistry class has advanced to the stages of Synthesis and Evaluation, and are able to work independently in both practical and theoretical undertakings. As their prior knowledge forms the basis of their enquiries they are able to readily interpret, extrapolate and infer information, doing so almost unconsciously and with little guidance from their teacher. This ability has been fostered and developed over their 13 years of schooling, with cross-disciplinary learning culminating in this autonomous learner. In their short 18-month college career these skills have been honed and refined for application in the laboratory, and as such they are trusted to act appropriately and efficiently with minimal active supervision. In my opinion this is indicative of very effective teaching, as the classroom operates on the self-driven actions of the students, with the teacher playing the role of mediator and guide. This student-driven learning also works to empower them, as they take responsibility for their own behaviour and their learning journey.
~~~***~~~
3. Contingency, thy name be planning
Planning strategies must take into account the inconvenient reality that in some instances, no matter how hard one tries, a class will complete none of the work assigned for the lesson. Even the best laid plans can prove to be unsuccessful when implemented, and maximising learning in such situations can be very difficult. Perseverance, flexibility and responsiveness will be the saviour in such situations, and it is essential to devise contingency plans and activities suitable for many different types of learners and environments, which can be used as a ‘last resort’ strategy when all else fails.
I have been caught unprepared in the classroom on a number of occasions. A crystallisation experiment took longer than was anticipated to complete, and I had no contingency activity to undertake whilst the students waited during this period. One-third of the lesson was spent doing effectively nothing, and thus I felt as though I had failed to capitalise on the minimal class time that I have to spend with them. Some productive discussions ensued, albeit, if I had been better prepared I would have organised an interim activity to further enhance the learning taking place.
I have also found myself floundering in my own ignorance, after starting to doubt the accuracy of my own knowledge. I genuinely forgot the types of bonding exhibited by specific molecules whilst I was trying to explain it to my students. I was able to salvage this mini-catastrophe by setting a homework question of discovering the bonding shown by the (obviously!) covalently-bonded molecule of silicon dioxide (sand). This was a very interesting experience, as I had not only forgotten something that I fundamentally know and understand, but I had done so in the midst of explaining the reasoning behind it to a group of people! I believe I was able to effectively preserve my credibility without providing fallacious information to my students – and my mentor teacher informed me that he did not realise that I had forgotten what it was that I was explaining.